EMERGENT-1【KarXT(Cobenfy)】Efficacy Compared to Current Drugs in Phase 2

この記事は約12分で読めます。

Introduction

In this article, I write about KarXT(Cobenfy) by Karuna, the new drug in development that I am most excited about at the moment.

In the previous article, I wrote about xanomeline, the main ingredient of KarXT. I also wrote about the side effects of KarXT and the development status of KarXT. Click here for a link to the previous article.

New Antipsychotics 1: KarXT Part1(Side Effects, Phase, Xanomeline)

In this article, I consider the efficacy of KarXT in terms of Phase 2 clinical trial results.

Efficacy (Clinical Trial Results)

The efficacy of KarXT for schizophrenia was measured in a Phase 2 trial using the PANSS (The Positive and Negative Symptom Scale).

The results showed a high degree of efficacy, with “clinically meaningful improvement” as well as “statistically significant improvement.”

For more information on PANSS, please refer to this article.

Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale(PANSS, Scale used to measure efficacy)

The results of the PANSS data measured over 35 days are shown in the table below,

with data presented for “Mean score”, “Mean reduction from Day0”, “difference from the placebo”, “95% confidence interval”, “P-value”, and “Effect size“.

Prior to KarXT
administration
5 weeks after KarXT
administration
Mean PANSS Total score 97.7 points
markedly ill
80.3 points
moderately ill
About 116 points severely ill 
About 95 points markedly ill
About 75 points moderately ill
About 58 points mildly ill  
Week5 (Day35)PANSS
Total score
PANSS
Positive score
PANSS
Negative score
Mean reduction from Day0-17.4-5.6-3.2
Mean placebo reduction-5.9-2.4-0.9
Difference
(95%CL)
-11.6
(-16.1~-7.1)
-3.2
(-4.8~-1.7)
-2.3
(-3.5~-1.1)
P-valuep<0.0001p<0.0001p<0.001
Effect size0.750.590.56


In this article, we will only look at the bottom row of KarXT’s efficacy data, the “effect size“.

Total effect (total of positive, negative, and other symptoms)

The effect size of the PANSS Total for KarXT in the Phase 2 study is 0.75. This would be a value that would be considered quite effective.

However, it should be noted that this is only one trial, so the evidence is still weak.

Stronger evidence comes from a meta-analysis, which combines the results of hundreds of clinical trials. The effect sizes of the PANSS Total for the other drugs calculated in the meta-analysis are shown in the table below.

A meta-analysis that includes KarXT has not yet been done. Since I have no choice, I will compare the effect sizes from the Phase 2 study of KarXT with the effect sizes from the meta-analysis of the other drugs.

PANSS
Total
Effect
size
Cloza
pine
0.89Sulpiride0.48Asena
pine
0.39
Ami
sulpride
0.73Chlorpro
mazine
0.44Lurasi
done
0.36
Olanza
pine
0.56Quetia
pine
0.42Caripra
zine
0.34
Risperi
done
0.55Aripipra
zole
0.41Iloperi
done
0.33
Paliperi
done
0.49Ziprasi
done
0.41Brexpipra
zole
0.26
Haloperi
dol
0.47Sertin
dole
0.40

To repeat, the Total PANSS effect size in the Phase 2 study of KarXT was 0.75.

As shown in the table above, the effect size of the PANSS Total for clozapine was 0.89 in the meta-analysis, making KarXT the next highest. This is higher than Amisulpride‘s 0.73 and olanzapine‘s 0.56.

Clozapine has dangerous side effects and can only be used when other drugs do not work. In other words, it can only be used in treatment-resistant patients.

So, for normal patients who do not have refractory schizophrenia, KarXT could be the top drug in terms of efficacy.

Effects on Positive Symptoms

We have now looked at the overall efficacy of KarXT. Next, let us look at the efficacy of KarXT focusing only on positive symptoms.

The effect size of the PANSS positive score for KarXT has not been published, but I calculated it by hand and found it to be 0.59.

The effect sizes for PANSS-positive scores for other drugs are as follows

PANSS
Positive
Effect
size
Ami
sulpride
0.69Haloperi
dol
0.49Lurasi
done
0.33
Cloza
pine
0.64Asena
pine
0.47Caripra
zine
0.30
Risperi
done
0.61Ziprasi
done
0.43Iloperi
done
0.30
Chlorpro
mazine
0.57Quetia
pine
0.40Brex
piprazole
0.17
Olanza
pine
0.53Sertin
dole
0.40
Paliperi
done
0.53Ari
piprazole
0.38

The value of 0.59 for KarXT is lower than 0.69 for Amisulpride, 0.64 for Clozapine, and 0.61 for Risperidone, but higher than 0.53 for Olanzapine.

The effect of KarXT on positive symptoms approaches that of Risperidone and may be superior to that of olanzapine. It appears to be sufficiently effective.

Effects on Negative Symptoms

Next, let us look at the effect of KarXT on negative symptoms only.

The effect size of KarXT on the PANSS negative score was calculated manually to be 0.56.

The effect sizes for PANSS negative scores for other drugs are as follows

PANSS
Negative
Effect
size
Cloza
pine
0.62Paliperi
done
0.37Haloperi
dol
0.29
Ami
sulpride
0.50Chlorpro
mazine
0.35Lurasi
done
0.29
Olanza
pine
0.45Ari
piprazole
0.33Brex
piprazole
0.25
Asena
pine
0.42Ziprasi
done
0.33Iloperi
done
0.22
Sertin
dole
0.40Cari
prazine
0.32
Risperi
done
0.37Quetia
pine
0.31

KarXT‘s value of 0.56 is second only to clozapine‘s 0.62. It is also higher than Amisulpride‘s 0.50 and olanzapine‘s 0.45.

The effect of KarXT on negative symptoms was surprisingly higher than that of Amisulpride in this trial alone.

Conclusion

  • The overall efficacy of KarXT could be topped if we exclude clozapine, which has dangerous side effects.
  • KarXT’s effectiveness for positive symptoms is similar to Risperidone and may be superior to olanzapine.
  • KarXT’s effectiveness on negative symptoms may be higher than Amisulpride.

Comment

Again, KarXT has been the most promising drug so far.

When looking at whether a new drug is good or bad, the higher the PANSS total effect size, the better.

However, I think it is more important to have a high PANSS negative effect size with an adequate PANSS positive effect size.

In addition, improvement in cognitive function and low side effects are also important.

KarXT may meet most of these criteria.

I hope to see other drugs that are not only effective on the PANSS total, but also effective on negative symptoms, effective in improving cognitive function, and with fewer side effects.

Aug. 12, 2022 note: Results of Phase 3 study of KarXT are now available.
EMERGENT-2 / KarXT Efficacy Compared to Current Drugs in Phase 3

March. 31, 2023 note: Results of Phase 3 study of KarXT are now available.
EMERGENT-3 / KarXT Efficacy Compared to Current Drugs in Phase3

Click here for links to related articles.
New Antipsychotics 1: KarXT Part1(Side Effects, Phase, Xanomeline)

New Antipsychotics 2: Emraclidine(Phase1b efficacy data)

【NBI-1117568】Detailed analysis of Phase 2 results data/More effective than olanzapine

There is an article summarizing KarXT(Cobenfy).
Five Advantages of Taking KarXT (Cobenfy)/ A Summary Article for Beginners

Please give us your feedback on this post to improve our blog. (Multiple choices allowed) No.63

References

ご意見、ご感想、ご要望、質問、不明な箇所、間違い指摘などは、すぐ下の問い合わせのリンクからお気軽にお寄せ下さい。匿名で結構です。m(_ _)m
Go to Contact Form
ご意見、ご感想、ご要望、質問、不明な箇所、間違い指摘などは、すぐ下の問い合わせのリンクからお気軽にお寄せ下さい。匿名で結構です。m(_ _)m
Go to Contact Form
Muscarinic Agonists
MATSをフォローする

コメント

タイトルとURLをコピーしました